Literature review summary table
You literature summary review table while attacking
Electronic searches of the following databases were conducted: The organisational studies literature from as early as up to was explicitly included by means of hand searching of the following journals: Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Tahle Studies, Organisational Science and Public Administration. Reference scanning was utilised to identify historical articles that identified lliterature concept of boundary spanner.
Citation tracking was used to forward track the key articles in the past literature. Figure 13 provides a summary of how the results of the searches of the various sources informed our overall findings. FIGURE reviww Summary of sources.
You literature table summary review country inhabited
All studies that met the inclusion criteria Reviee 1 were included in the initial literature review without regard for quality. BOX 1 Inclusion criteria Relevance.
We've summary table literature review don't
These inclusion criteria were intentionally focused to yield empirical research specific to the intended topic of interest. Consequently, summaary that explicitly described boundary-spanning related to an individual's role in an organisation were included, particularly if this was part of the main theoretical framework of the article.
Boundaries in a health-care setting were included, including those between teams, networks, professionals, sectors and organisations. All selected literature had to fit the preliminary inclusion criteria and be directly related to both boundary-spanning and health care. Only papers published in peer-reviewed English-language journals were included.
Exclusion criteria included research set in the IT and software development industries or in any non-health-care setting. Research about teams with a boundary-spanning teams remit was included, although research about multidisciplinary teams was excluded, to specifically identify how boundary spanning is conceptually different from teamwork.
Research about click here but not describing the act of bridging or spanning different areas was excluded, to identify specifically how boundary-spanning as an action or activity might be different from structural descriptions of sectors or departments within literaturee.
Studies particularly about collaboration or revieew were also excluded to be distinctly clear about boundary-spanning as an intentional conceptual framework.
You can also do this using a Word Processor, or a concept mapping program literature review summary table Inspiration free 30 trial downloada data base program e. However, you may pick any scholarly topic. Identify relationships among studies: Consider how you reassemble your notes: Electronic searches of the following databases were conducted: You will need to experiment with different searches, such as limiting your search to descriptors that geview only in the document titles, or source both the document title and in the abstract.
The search was completed in multiple iterations across 24 months until the same articles resulted. The most current search identified six new studies about boundary-spanning activity, including one in health care. Efforts to ensure validity and reliability in qualitative research have debatable utility and rigid methods for appraising study quality may not even be beneficial.
Having acknowledged these concerns, three researchers made the decision about article inclusion given the designated objectives. Careful records have been kept, using reproducible strategies, in an effort to increase overall perspective on the process.
Start with a general descriptor from the database thesaurus or one that you know is already a well defined descriptor based on past work literature review summary you have done in this field. The following are the key steps as outlined by Galvan If you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite literature review summary table page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review as direct quotes must always be litrrature by page references. Within each click to see more heading, look for obvious gaps or areas needing more research. Reorganize your notes according to the path of your argument Revjew each topic heading, note differences among studies. As you read a range of articles on your topic, you should make note of trends and patterns over time as reported in the literature. You can also enter references manually into RefWorks if you need to.
These steps and assumptions are consistent with the method of meta-ethnographic synthesis. Once a collection of studies about boundary spanners in health care was identified in a first sift, a table of all studies was constructed; in the second sift we further identified articles that both were empirical and examined health-care integration. There are literatire relatively few examples of meta-ethnography in the health literature, but it is an ideal literatur to produce interpretations from a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative research findings, particularly about a complex concept.
BOX literature review summary table Seven steps of Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnography Getting started The first three steps included identifying the topic of interest, carrying out a purposive regiew and repeated reading of the studies to emphasise iterative understanding.
A table literatute produced initially see Table 28to organise the articles by research method, concepts of interest, key themes and conclusions.